Legal Opinion
Department of Land Conservation & Development v. Lincoln County
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided October 9, 1996No. LUBA 95-166; CA A93565PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDeits, P. J.
Petitioners Watson and Pacific H.W. Investments, Inc. (petitioners) applied for, and, in July 1995, the Lincoln County governing body approved, a 113-lot planned unit development on a 50-acre site in a rural residential zone. The Department of Land Conservation and Development (DLCD) appealed the decision to LUBA, contending that the approval violated an amendment to Goal 11 that became effective in December 1994. LUBA agreed and reversed the county’s decision. Petitioners and the county seek our review. We reverse.
Goal 11 relates to public facilities and services and requires generally that…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
- Friends of Oregon v. LCDC (Curry Co.)Oregon Supreme Court · 1986
- Foland v. Jackson CountyOregon Supreme Court · 1991
3Cited by7 opinions
- Department of Land Conservation & Development v. Jackson CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1997
- Gisler v. Deschutes CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1997
- Jaqua v. City of SpringfieldCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2004
- Pilgrim v. Clatskanie People's Utility DistrictCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1997
- Foland v. Jackson CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2010
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.