Legal Opinion
Jaqua v. City of Springfield
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided June 9, 2004No. 2003-072, 2003-073, 2003-077, 2003-078; A123624PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtEdmonds, P. J.
Robin and John Jaqua, owners of nearby affected land, petition for judicial review of a Land Use Board of Appeals (LUBA) decision regarding two City of Springfield ordinances. In addition, the City of Springfield (city) and PeaceHealth, the developer of a proposed regional hospital complex on the subject lands, cross-petition for judicial review of LUBA’s decision. 1 The challenged ordinances amend a regional land use plan and a refinement of that plan, and they facilitate the future rezoning of 99 acres within the city for purposes of PeaceHealth’s development. We reverse on the Jaquas’…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Clark v. Jackson CountyOregon Supreme Court · 1994
- Department of Land Conservation & Development v. Lincoln CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
- Department of Transportation v. City of Klamath FallsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001
- State v. MartinCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1997
- Alanis v. Barrett Business ServicesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2002
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Polk County v. Department of Land Conservation & DevelopmentCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
- Willamette Oaks, LLC v. City of EugeneCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2009
- Knutson Family LLC v. City of EugeneCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2005
- Moore v. City of EugeneCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2020
- Delta Property Co. v. Lane CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.