Department of Land Conservation & Development v. Jackson County
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtRiggs, P. J.
Petitioners seek review of LUBA’s reversal of Jackson County’s decision granting petitioners’ application for a conditional use permit to expand an existing golf course. We reverse and remand.
The golf course is presently located, in its entirety, on urban land inside the urban growth boundary (UGB) of the City of Medford. The area of the proposed expansion would include some land that is outside the UGB, some that is zoned for exclusive farm use (EFU), and some that is “high-value farmland” under the Land Conservation and Development Commission’s (LCDC) rules codified at OAR 660-33-010 et…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
- Lane County v. Land Conservation & Development CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1997
- 1000 Friends of Oregon v. Wasco County CourtOregon Supreme Court · 1985
- Gage v. City of PortlandCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1995
- Dunning v. Corrections Facility Siting AuthorityOregon Supreme Court · 1997
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- State v. McBroomCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2002
- State v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000
- Linn-Benton-Lincoln Education Ass'n/OEA/NEA v. Linn-Benton-Lincoln ESDCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
- Ericsson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012
- Warburton v. Harney CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.