State v. Harper
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtVan Hoomissen, J.
Defendant appeals his conviction for felony driving while suspended (DWS). ORS 811.175. The dispositive issue is whether he may collaterally attack the validity of a previous revocation of his driving privileges. We reverse.
On May 31, 1983, defendant received a notice from the Motor Vehicles Division (MVD) that, because the Multnomah County Circuit Court had designated him a habitual traffic offender (HTO), his license was revoked, effective June 6, 1983. The notice did not inform defendant that, if he requested a hearing, the effective date of the revocation would be postponed, pending the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- State v. HardtCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1986
- State v. HardtCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1986
- State v. AtkinsonOregon Supreme Court · 1988
3Cited by4 opinions
- Franklin v. StateCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991
- State v. IveyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
- State v. VandepollCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
- State v. VandepollCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993