Legal Opinion

State v. Hardt

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided December 31, 1986No. 85-0290; CA A37992PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtYoung, J.

The state petitions for reconsideration, see ORAP 10.10(1), of our decision in State v. Hardt, 81 Or App 607, 726 P2d 953 (1986). The state argues (1) that we misread City of Pendleton v. Standerfer, 297 Or 725, 688 P2d 68 (1984), and State v. Grenvik, 291 Or 99, 628 P2d 1195 (1981), and (2) that, even if the two 1980 driving while suspended (DWS) convictions were invalid, we nonetheless erred in affirming the trial court’s dismissal of the indictment.

First, we did not “misread” Standerfer and Grenvik. We refused to consider the state’s argument based on those cases, because the state failed…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. GrenvikOregon Supreme Court · 1981
  2. City of Pendleton v. StanderferOregon Supreme Court · 1984
  3. State v. HardtCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1986

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. State v. JacksonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001
  2. State v. SimsOregon Supreme Court · 2003
  3. State v. RiddellCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001
  4. State v. HarperCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1988
  5. Franklin v. StateCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API