Legal Opinion

State v. Atkinson

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided March 15, 1988No. TC 85-CR-64; CA A37968; SC S33517PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*297CARSON, J.

This case involves the required contents of a notice of revocation of driving privileges by the Motor Vehicles Division (MVD) to a person found to be a habitual traffic offender. We are asked to determine whether the revocation notice issued under former ORS 484.718,1 which failed to state explicitly that the revocation would be stayed pending a requested hearing, is adequate to support a subsequent conviction for felony driving while suspended.2

The facts are not disputed. MVD revoked defendant’s driving privileges under former ORS 484.727,3 the habitual *298offender statute, and former…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. TooleyOregon Supreme Court · 1984
  2. State v. AdamsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1986
  3. State v. AdamsOregon Supreme Court · 1988
  4. State v. AtkinsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1986

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. State v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
  2. Dooney v. Department of TransportationOregon Supreme Court · 1988
  3. State v. AdamsOregon Supreme Court · 1988
  4. State v. VandepollCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
  5. State v. HarperCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1988

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API