Legal Opinion

State v. Vandepoll

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided February 17, 1993No. C910453CR, C910454CR CA A72073 (control) and CA A72074Published

1Opinion of the Court

846 P.2d 1174 (1993)

118 Or. App. 193

STATE of Oregon, Respondent,

v.

Peter Alexander VANDEPOLL, Appellant.

C910453CR, C910454CR; CA A72073 (control) and CA A72074.

Court of Appeals of Oregon, In Banc.[*]

Argued and Submitted September 4, 1992.

Resubmitted January 6, 1993.

Decided February 17, 1993.

Reconsideration Denied March 17, 1993.

Michael Curtis, Portland, argued the cause and filed the brief, for appellant.

Rives Kistler, Asst. Atty. Gen., Salem, argued the cause, for respondent. On the brief were Charles S. Crookham, Atty. Gen., Virginia L. Linder, Sol. Gen., and Michael C. Livingston, Asst.…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Loe Et Ux v. LenhardOregon Supreme Court · 1961
  2. Davis v. Wasco Intermediate Education DistrictOregon Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Brown v. Portland School District No. 1Oregon Supreme Court · 1981
  4. Stroh v. State Accident Insurance FundOregon Supreme Court · 1972
  5. State v. TooleyOregon Supreme Court · 1984

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API