Legal Opinion

Franklin v. State

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided October 23, 1991No. A8906-03224; CA A63087PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDeits, J.

Petitioner brought this action under the Post-Conviction Hearing Act, ORS 138.510 et seq, to set aside a misdemeanor conviction for driving while suspended, three felony convictions for driving while suspended and three felony convictions for driving in violation of a habitual traffic offender order. ORS 811.175; ORS 811.182; ORS 811.185. He argues that the convictions should be set aside, because one of the convictions underlying the habitual traffic offender order is void. The trial court denied relief. We affirm.

The facts are not disputed. In May and June, 1982, Motor Vehicles Division…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. North v. CuppOregon Supreme Court · 1969
  2. State v. TooleyOregon Supreme Court · 1984
  3. State v. HardtCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1986
  4. State v. HardtCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1986
  5. State v. HarperCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1988

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Palmer v. State of OregonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
  2. Palmer v. State of OregonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
  3. State v. IveyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API