Legal Opinion
Rehman v. State University of New York at Stony Brook
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided February 6, 2009No. 08CV0326 (ADS)(MLO)PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION AND ORDER
SPATT, District Judge.
I. BACKGROUND
The following facts are derived from the parties’ pleadings. On this motion, the Court also considers documents incorporated by reference in the complaint. Nechis v. Oxford Health Plans Inc., 421 F.3d 96, 100 (2d Cir.2005) (noting that on a 12(b)(6) motion to dismiss, the Court must limits its “consideration to facts stated in the complaint or documents attached to the complaint as exhibits or incorporated by reference”).
The plaintiff, Jamil Rehman, M.D. (“Rehman”), is a Board Certified urologist licensed to practice in the…
2Cases cited45 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Swierkiewicz v. Sorema N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Schuler v. PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS, LLPCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2010
- Rankel v. Town of SomersDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2014
- Buckman v. CALYON SECURITIES (USA) INC.District Court, S.D. New York · 2011
- Gary Friedrich Enterprises, LLC v. Marvel Enterprises, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2010
- Osterweil v. BartlettDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2011
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.