Legal Opinion

Dixie Poster Advertising Co. v. City of Asheville

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided June 3, 1925PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAdams, J.

The object of this action is to restrain the collection of a tax levied by the city of Asheville for the privilege of advertising by tbe use of billboards. At tbe bearing tbe judge found certain facts, among wbicb are these: (1) Tbe plaintiff in tbe exercise of its corporate powers conducts a business known as “Outdoor Advertising,” and for this purpose maintains a large number of billboards and poster-boards situated on private property; (2) when tbe suit was instituted tbe plaintiff owned, leased and used about 150 boards, erected at a cost of more tban $10,000, tbe total posting surface of…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Terrace v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  2. Walla Walla City v. Walla Walla Water Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1898
  3. Packard v. BantonSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
  4. Boise Artesian Hot & Cold Water Co. v. Boise CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1909
  5. State v. . R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1907

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Schloss v. JamisonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
  2. Roller v. AllenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
  3. SS Kresge Company v. DavisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  4. McCormick v. . ProctorSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
  5. Wood v. . BraswellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1926

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API