Dixie Poster Advertising Co. v. City of Asheville
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtAdams, J.
The object of this action is to restrain the collection of a tax levied by the city of Asheville for the privilege of advertising by tbe use of billboards. At tbe bearing tbe judge found certain facts, among wbicb are these: (1) Tbe plaintiff in tbe exercise of its corporate powers conducts a business known as “Outdoor Advertising,” and for this purpose maintains a large number of billboards and poster-boards situated on private property; (2) when tbe suit was instituted tbe plaintiff owned, leased and used about 150 boards, erected at a cost of more tban $10,000, tbe total posting surface of…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Terrace v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Walla Walla City v. Walla Walla Water Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1898
- Packard v. BantonSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Boise Artesian Hot & Cold Water Co. v. Boise CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1909
- State v. . R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1907
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Schloss v. JamisonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
- Roller v. AllenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
- SS Kresge Company v. DavisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
- McCormick v. . ProctorSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
- Wood v. . BraswellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1926
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.