Legal Opinion

McClelland Et Ux. v. Copeland

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 4, 1946No. Appeals, 199, 200, 132 and 133PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Jones,

The question of chief importance raised on these appeals is whether the presence of four persons on the front seat of an automobile constitutes negligence per se which bars them, as a matter of law, from recovering for injuries allegedly suffered through the negligence of others in an accident wherein the automobile, in which the former were so riding, was involved.

In the late afternoon (about six-thirty) of September 4, 1944, D. R. McClelland, one of the appellees, was driving a Chevrolet “pick-up” truck, owned by himself and wife, eastwardly on Route 59, an…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Jinks v. CurrieSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  2. Lane v. E. A. Mullen, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1925
  3. Purol, Inc. v. Great Eastern System, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
  4. Mashinsky v. PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  5. Mahoney v. City of PittsburghSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1935

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. LITTLE v. JarvisSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
  2. Fisher v. HillSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1949
  3. Richter's Loan Company v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1956
  4. Nixon v. ChiarilliSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
  5. Nunamaker v. New Alexandria Bus Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1952

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API