Nixon v. Chiarilli
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Justice Chidsey,
These are appeals from orders denying defendant’s motions for new trials and for judgments non obstante veredicto.
Plaintiffs, Orón W. Nixon and Helen C. Nixon, husband and wife, brought suit in trespass for damages resulting from a collision of an automobile in which plaintiffs were riding, driven by Orón W. Nixon, and a car owned and operated by the defendant, Anthony O. Chiarilli. The suit of the husband and wife was severed for the purpose of joining the husband-driver as an additional defendant in the wife’s action. The two actions were then tried together…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Wagner v. Philadelphia Rapid Transit Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1916
- Landis v. Conestoga Transportation Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1944
- McFadden v. Pennzoil CompanySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
- Richardson v. PattersonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
- Ennis v. AtkinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1946
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Smail v. FlockSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
- Haddigan v. HarkinsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1970
- Matkevich v. RobertsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1961
- Burr v. Adam Eidemiller, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
- Kenworthy v. BurghartSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.