Legal Opinion

Fisher v. Hill

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 18, 1949No. Appeals, 81 and 82PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Me. Justice Jones,

These appeals arise out of an action in trespass instituted by George E. Fisher, Jr.,, as administrator of the estate of his deceased wife, and individually in his own right for damages for Mrs. Fisher’s death due allegedly to the defendant’s negligence. The jury returned verdicts for the plaintiff in each of his capacities. The defendant filed motions for judgments n. o. v. and for a new trial which the learned court below refused. From the judgments entered on the verdicts, the defendant brings these appeals.

The appellant contends (1) that the evidence was…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Landis v. Conestoga Transportation Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1944
  2. Ennis v. AtkinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1946
  3. Majewski v. LempkaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  4. Miles v. MyersSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1945
  5. Amey v. ErbSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1929

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Fisher v. HillSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
  2. Giffin v. EnsignCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1956
  3. Streilein v. VogelSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1949
  4. Kosco v. Hachmeister, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
  5. Matkevich v. RobertsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1961

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API