Legal Opinion

Jinks v. Currie

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 6, 1936No. Appeals, 275 and 276PublishedCited by 62 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Schaffer,

An automobile belonging to and driven by the defendant, Nancy B. Currie, and a truck owned and operated by the defendant, Israel Cooperstein, were involved in the accident in which the plaintiff, Bertha Jinks, was injured. She and her husband brought this action against both the persons named, charging that their concurrent negligence caused the damages sustained. The jury rendered verdicts against both defendants. Nancy B. Currie alone appeals from the judgments entered.

Plaintiffs were guests in the automobile driven by Mrs. Currie. No question of their…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Zandras v. MoffettSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926
  2. Lane v. E. A. Mullen, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1925
  3. Stehle v. Jaeger Automatic Machine Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1909
  4. Hayes Et Ux. v. SchomakerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
  5. Johnson v. American Reduction Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1931

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by62 opinions

  1. Kuhns v. BruggerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
  2. Boyd v. SmithSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1953
  3. Ashworth v. HannumSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1943
  4. DeLuca v. Manchester Laundry & Dry Cleaning Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
  5. Gatenby v. Altoona Aviation Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1968

57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API