Law Trust Society v. Hogue
Oregon Supreme Court
From Washington : Thos. A. McBride, Judge. This is a suit to foreclose a mortgage. The transcript shows that the defendants Harvey A. Hogue and Sarah L. Hogue, his wife, on September 1, 1892, gave to the Jarvis-Conklin Mortgage Trust Co. their promissory note for $6,600, payable in five years, with interest thereon at the rate of five and one-half per cent, per annum, payable semiannually, and stipulated therein that, if either principal or interest remained unpaid ten days…
Read the full summary
From Washington : Thos. A. McBride, Judge. This is a suit to foreclose a mortgage. The transcript shows that the defendants Harvey A. Hogue and Sarah L. Hogue, his wife, on September 1, 1892, gave to the Jarvis-Conklin Mortgage Trust Co. their promissory note for $6,600, payable in five years, with interest thereon at the rate of five and one-half per cent, per annum, payable semiannually, and stipulated therein that, if either principal or interest remained unpaid ten days after maturity, the principal should draw interest from date at the rate of eight per cent, per annum ; and to secure…
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Moore
It is contended by defendant’s counsel that the evidence introduced at the trial is insufficient to establish the corporate existence of the Jarvis-Conklin Mortgage Trust Co. or of the plaintiff, and that the court erred in finding otherwise, while plaintiff’s counsel insists that the transcript fails to show that Jones has any substantial interest in the result of the suit, and hence his plea is a nullity ; that said plea and answer do not deny, but only allege upon information and belief, a- lack of knowledge respecting the incorporation of said company and society, and therefore the…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- San Francisco Gas Co. v. City of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1858
- State v. SavageOregon Supreme Court · 1900
- Jackson v. JacksonOregon Supreme Court · 1888
- United States Bank v. StearnsNew York Supreme Court · 1836
- Wyatt v. WyattOregon Supreme Court · 1897
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Cissna Loan Co. v. GawleyWashington Supreme Court · 1915
- Easton v. Butterfield Live Stock Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1929
- The Multorpor Co. v. ReedOregon Supreme Court · 1927
- Roll Ex Rel. Ralph D. Kaiser Co. v. Rothenberg (In Re Rothenberg)District Court, District of Columbia · 1996
- Union Central Life Insurance v. LaFolletteOregon Supreme Court · 1935