Legal Opinion

The Multorpor Co. v. Reed

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided September 20, 1927PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcBRIDE, J.

A brief statement of the facts, which, in our opinion, are satisfactorily proved in this case, and which will serve as a basis for onr conclusions as to the law of the case, is as follows:

In Estacada there was a partnership firm consisting of the defendant’s husband J. W. Reed and Earl Shibley doing business as Reed & Shibley. Some time prior to the institution of this action, Reed died and the defendant, his widow, was, by the consent of Shibley, appointed administratrix of the estate and purchased Shibley’s interest in the partnership estate. Thereafter, she filed a petition in the County…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Willis v. . SharpNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
  2. S. C. Herbst Importing Co. v. HoganMontana Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Hartford Ins. v. Central R. R.Oregon Supreme Court · 1914
  4. Goodale Lumber Co. v. ShawOregon Supreme Court · 1902
  5. In re S. Marks & Co.'s EstateOregon Supreme Court · 1913

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Consolidated Placers, Inc. v. GrantNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Shea v. GravesOregon Supreme Court · 1933
  3. Brandtjen & Kluge, Inc. v. BiggsOregon Supreme Court · 1955
  4. McLean v. MorrowCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1940
  5. HANN v. NoredOregon Supreme Court · 1963

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API