Legal Opinion

Union Central Life Insurance v. LaFollette

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided March 19, 1935PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBailey, J.

The principal question concerned in this appeal is whether or not the transaction between the plaintiff and the defendants LaFollette, involving a loan of $13,000 secured by a mortgage on real property, provided for a usurious rate of interest.

On or about May 20,1930, the defendant Joseph W. LaFollette and his wife and two daughters procured from the plaintiff a loan of $13,000, and about the same date the LaFollettes executed and delivered to the plaintiff 21 promissory notes. The first of these notes was for $482.81, payable December 1,1930, and the next six were due and payable on December…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Parks, Administrator v. LubbockTexas Supreme Court · 1899
  2. Ginn v. New England Mortgage Security Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1890
  3. Spiller v. BellCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1932
  4. Shive v. Braniff Inv. Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1934
  5. Ætna Life Ins. Co. v. FosterCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1933

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Berman v. SchwartzNew York Supreme Court · 1968
  2. McWilliams v. Northwestern Mut. Life Ins. Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1940
  3. Ranson v. SnyderMississippi Supreme Court · 1954
  4. Peoples Finance & Thrift Co. of Salt Lake City v. BlomquistUtah Supreme Court · 1964

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API