Legal Opinion
Herz v. Hereford
California Court of Appeal
Decided January 10, 1928No. Docket No. 4635PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
STEPHENS, J., pro tem.
Findings of fact, conclusions of law, and judgment for plaintiff were signed by the trial judge in this ease and duly filed. Thereafter defendant, appellant herein, moved the court to set aside the judgment entered and to enter. in its stead judgment for defendant on the ground that the judgment was not supported by the findings. (Secs. 663, 663a, Code Civ. Proc.) At the conclusion of the presentation of this motion, and on the fifteenth day of June, 1923, the court made the following order:
“The motion of the defendant to vacate the judgment herein coming on to be heard,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Akley v. BassettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
- Stanton v. Superior Court of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
- Stringer v. DavisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1866
- Imperial Valley Land Co. v. Globe Grain & Milling Co.California Supreme Court · 1921
- Dahlberg v. GirschCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Risco v. ReussCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
- Warren Southwest, Inc. v. WicksCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969