Legal Opinion

Risco v. Reuss

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 7, 1941No. Civ. 12363PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDoran, J.

Plaintiff appeals from a judgment dismissing the action herein after a demurrer to plaintiff’s second amended complaint was sustained without leave to amend further.

The material allegations of the complaint in question are as follows:

“That on or about the 31st day of January, 1939, the plaintiff was the owner of a lease on and in possession of, the premises known as 7908 South Vermont Avenue, Los Angeles, California, used and operated as a general garage and that plaintiff had operated said business on said premises for eight years and had builded a good will of business in connection with…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Keller v. KellerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
  2. Watterson v. Owens River Canal Co.California Supreme Court · 1922
  3. Reilly v. RichardsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
  4. Dent v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1908
  5. Herz v. HerefordCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Gruenberg v. Aetna InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
  2. Wolfsen v. HathawayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  3. Steiner v. RowleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
  4. Friendly Village Community Ass'n v. Silva & Hill Construction Co.California Court of Appeal · 1973
  5. Curci v. Palo Verde Irrigation DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API