Warren Southwest, Inc. v. Wicks
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
26, 1967, reading, “Motion for new and different judgment granted. Motion for new trial denied. Counsel notified this date, by copies of Memo filed this date” to be construed as an order made under section 663 or section 662 of the Code of Civil Procedure? We have concluded for the reasons set forth below that it should be deemed to be an order made under section 662 and that the judgment and order appealed from should be affirmed.
I
Plaintiff, Warren Southwest, Inc., brought an action to recover the value of a tandem-roller, which defendant, C. H. Wicks, had rented from plaintiff and which was…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Phelan v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
- Akley v. BassettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
- Spier v. LangCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
- Gossman v. GossmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
- Stanton v. Superior Court of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Estate of RussellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
- Medak v. CoxCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
- Prager & Bear, Inc. v. Federal InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
- Bank of America v. LazzeroniCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971