Coody v. AH Robins Co., Inc.
Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Before CADENA, C.J., and BUTTS and REEVES, JJ. CADENA, Chief Justice.
Plaintiff, Martha Ann Coody, appeals from an order granting the motion for summary judgment filed by defendant, A.H. Robins Co., Inc. The summary judgment that plaintiff take nothing was based on the ground that her action for injuries resulting from her use of an intrauterine device manufactured by defendant was barred by limitations.
In February, 1972, plaintiff’s physician fitted her with an intrauterine device (IUD) known as a Daikon Shield which was manufactured by defendant. A few months later plaintiff began…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Nelson v. KrusenTexas Supreme Court · 1984
- Gaddis v. SmithTexas Supreme Court · 1967
- Neagle v. NelsonTexas Supreme Court · 1985
- Metal Structures Corp. v. Plains Textiles, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1971
- Albert J. Fusco v. Johns-Manville Products Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Moreno v. Sterling Drug, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1990
- Bell v. Showa Denko K.K., Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)1995
- Seibert v. General Motors Corp.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1993
- Allen v. Roddis Lumber and Veneer Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1990
- Colonial Penn Insurance v. Market Planners Insurance Agency Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1998
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.