Legal Opinion

Neagle v. Nelson

Texas Supreme Court

Decided January 30, 1985No. C-2576PublishedCited by 136 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WALLACE, Justice.

This appeal presents an attack on the constitutionality of the limitations provision in the 1977 Medical Liability Act. Bobby Neagle filed this malpractice action against Dr. George C. Nelson, Dr. Roy J. Hotz and two nurses, Nancy S. Kieschnick and Linda N. White. He alleged that a surgical sponge had been left in his abdomen during an appendectomy in which the respondents had participated. Each respondent moved for summary judgment on the ground that *12Neagle’s claim was barred by a two-year statute of limitations. TEX.REV.CIV. STAT.ANN. art. 4590i, § 10.01. The trial court…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Sax v. VottelerTexas Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Nelson v. KrusenTexas Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Bayouth v. Lion Oil Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Neagle v. Nelson, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1983

3Cited by136 opinions

  1. Molinet v. KimbrellTexas Supreme Court · 2011
  2. Shah v. MossTexas Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Morrison v. ChanTexas Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Texas Mutual Insurance Co. v. RuttigerTexas Supreme Court · 2012
  5. Lucas v. United StatesTexas Supreme Court · 1988

131 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API