Legal Opinion

Allen v. Roddis Lumber and Veneer Co.

Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District

Decided August 31, 1990No. 13-90-026-CVPublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

KEYS, Justice.

This is a summary judgment case. Appellants, Bruce and Amanda Allen, filed suit against appellees, Roddis Lumber and Veneer Company (Roddis), Chester W. Kyle d/b/a Kyle Homes and/or Kyle Properties Inc. (Kyle), City Lumber Company, Allen Furniture Company, and Bernhardt Industries, for damages arising from the alleged presence of formaldehyde in appellees’ products. Appellees’ motions for summary judgment alleged that appellants’ causes of action were barred by the statute of limitations. They also alleged that as a matter of law no causation existed.

In the Allens’ first…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Burns v. ThomasTexas Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Randall v. Dallas Power & Light Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Shook v. HermanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1988
  4. Coody v. AH Robins Co., Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1985
  5. Wright v. Lewis, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1989

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Childs v. HausseckerTexas Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Coastal Tankships, U.S.A., Inc. v. Anderson, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2002
  3. Neimes v. Kien Chung Ta, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1999
  4. Seibert v. General Motors Corp.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1993
  5. Schaefer v. Gulf Coast Regional Blood CenterCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API