Albert J. Fusco v. Johns-Manville Products Corp.
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
SPEARS, District Judge:
Fusco appeals from a district court order granting summary judgment for JohnsManville and other named defendants. We affirm the district court.
The only issue on appeal is whether the district court correctly granted summary judgment for Johns-Manville and other manufacturers (manufacturers) on the basis that Fusco’s cause of action was time-barred. Summary judgment is proper in a situation where there is no genuine issue of material fact, and upon which the moving party is entitled to prevail as a matter of law. Fed.R.Civ.P. 56(c). It is our duty to evaluate the facts…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Atkins v. CroslandTexas Supreme Court · 1967
- Northwest Power Products, Inc. v. Omark Industries, Inc., Bob Wooten, and Bosco Fastening Service Center, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
- United States Steel Corp. v. Elton H. Darby, Defendant-Third Party v. Southern Fabricating Company, Inc., Third PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1975
- Garcia v. Texas Instruments, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1980
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Kansa Reinsurance Co., Ltd. v. Congressional Mortg. Corp. of TexasCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
- Gideon v. Johns-Manville Sales Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1985
- In Re Johns-Manville Corp.United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 1984
- Austin v. Abney Mills, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 2002
- Thomas v. Barton Lodge II, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1999
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.