Legal Opinion
Bell v. Showa Denko K.K.
Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)
Decided June 23, 1995No. 07-94-0138-CVPublishedCited by 107 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BOYD, Justice.
Appellant Savannah Bell brings this appeal from a take-nothing summary judgment in favor of appellees Showa Denko K.K. d/b/a Showa Denko, Showa Denko America, Inc. d/b/a Showa Denko, Whole Foods, Inc., Fitness Foods, Inc., Roy’s Nutrition Center, Inc. and Makers of KAL, Inc. In three points of error, she urges the trial court erred in 1) granting appellees’ motions for summary judgment based on the statute of limitations as a genuine issue of material fact existed as to when appellant knew, or should have known, of her injury and its cause; 2) granting appellees’ motions for…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Nixon v. Mr. Property Management Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1985
- City of Houston v. Clear Creek Basin AuthorityTexas Supreme Court · 1979
- American Pipe & Construction Co. v. UtahSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Lear Siegler, Inc. v. PerezTexas Supreme Court · 1991
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by107 opinions
- Childs v. HausseckerTexas Supreme Court · 1998
- Winters v. Diamond Shamrock Chemical Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1998
- Christopher v. Depuy Orthopaedics, Inc. (In Re Depuy Orthopaedics, Inc., Pinnacle Hip Implant Prod. Liab. Litig.)Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2018
- Mitchell Energy Corp. v. BartlettCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1997
- Wade v. Danek Medical, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1999
102 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.