Legal Opinion

Bowers v. Bowers

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided May 15, 1951No. 17445PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Atkinson, Presiding Justice.

(After stating the foregoing facts.) In the bill of exceptions error is assigned because of the exclusion of property values from evidence as follows: Counsel for the plaintiff asked his witness, Alfred M. Bowers: What is the value of the property which is sought to be partitioned? Counsel for the defendant objected on the ground that the value of the property would be immaterial. The court sustained the objection. .This evidence was excluded during the hearing on October 26, 1950.

The bill of exceptions was not presented to the trial court until December 4, 1950,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Good v. GoodSupreme Court of Georgia · 1949
  2. Pugh v. MooreSupreme Court of Georgia · 1950
  3. Rhodes v. LaneSupreme Court of Georgia · 1947

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Pearson v. GeorgeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1953
  2. Harvey v. SessomsSupreme Court of Georgia · 2008
  3. Mansour Properties, L.L.C. v. I-85/GA. 20 Ventures, Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 2004
  4. Meeks v. MeeksSupreme Court of Georgia · 1953
  5. Harvey v. SessomsSupreme Court of Georgia · 2008

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API