Legal Opinion

Good v. Good

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided March 16, 1949No. 16558, 16588PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Hawkins, Justice.

(After stating the foregoing facts.) This court has held many times that, in a habeas corpus proceeding involving a contest between parents over the custody of minor children, the award made by the trial judge ba'sed upon the evidence, and in the exercise of a sound discretion, will not be controlled by this court. This is true for the reason that the law puts upon the trial judge the duty of exercising a sound discretion in such cases, looking always to the best interest and welfare of the children. He has the parties before him, he sees and hears the witnesses testify, and…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Willingham v. WillinghamSupreme Court of Georgia · 1941
  2. So. Bell T. T. Co. v. Georgia Pub. Ser. Comm.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1948
  3. Southern Bell Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Georgia Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of Georgia · 1948
  4. Lamar v. HarrisSupreme Court of Georgia · 1903
  5. Callan Court Co. v. Citizens & Southern National BankSupreme Court of Georgia · 1937

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Madison v. MontgomerySupreme Court of Georgia · 1949
  2. Mallette v. MalletteSupreme Court of Georgia · 1964
  3. Williams v. RagsdaleSupreme Court of Georgia · 1949
  4. Durham v. SpenceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1972
  5. Dearman v. RhodenSupreme Court of Georgia · 1975

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API