Legal Opinion
Pearson v. George
Supreme Court of Georgia
Decided July 14, 1953No. 18262, 18269PublishedCited by 39 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Head, Justice.
In ground 1 of the amended motion for
new trial, the plaintiff assigns as error the following extract from a recharge by the court, at the request of the jury, as follows: “Gentlemen of the jury, the court charges you that, if part of the contract were canceled, it would all be canceled. The court construes it as a single contract.”
The plaintiff contends that, under paragraph 8 of the written contract, the option agreement was in no way dependent upon the agreement for the lease of the lands. This contention of the plaintiff can not be sustained. Crawford v. Smith, 151 Ga. 18…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Kelly v. Strouse & Bros.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1903
- Gibson v. AlfordSupreme Court of Georgia · 1926
- Clark v. CagleSupreme Court of Georgia · 1914
- McDaniel v. Mallary Bros. Machinery Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1909
- Williams v. Empire Mutual Annuity & Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1910
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by39 opinions
- Department of Human Resources v. PhillipsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1997
- Tybrisa Co. v. Tybeeland, Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1964
- Entrepreneur, Ltd. v. YasunaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1985
- Smith v. GordonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2004
- Brooks v. HicksSupreme Court of Georgia · 1973
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.