Legal Opinion

Pugh v. Moore

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided November 14, 1950No. 17284PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Atkinson, Presiding Justice.

(After stating the foregoing facts.)

1. The defendants demurred on the ground that the petition discloses no right on the part of the petitioner to appear for or act in behalf of Varo, who under the allegations of the petition was not in any way incapacitated or incapable of acting for himself.

In Horn v. Towson, 163 Ga. 37 (135 S. E. 487), this court said: “Every tenant in common has the right to possess the joint property; and if he does not receive more than his share of the rents and profits thereof, he is not liable to his cotenant. . . [Code, §§ 85-1003,…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Huntress v. PortwoodSupreme Court of Georgia · 1902
  2. Clark v. CagleSupreme Court of Georgia · 1914
  3. Kniepkamp v. RichardsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1941
  4. Blumberg v. NathanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1940
  5. Good v. GoodSupreme Court of Georgia · 1949

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. J. D. Jewell, Inc. v. HancockSupreme Court of Georgia · 1970
  2. Lindsey v. GuhlSupreme Court of Georgia · 1976
  3. LYNCH CORPORATION v. StoneSupreme Court of Georgia · 1955
  4. Blair v. BlairSupreme Court of Georgia · 1952
  5. Bowers v. BowersSupreme Court of Georgia · 1951

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API