Legal Opinion
St. Louis S. F. R. Co. v. Bruner
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided March 28, 1916No. 5085PublishedCited by 10 opinions
Error from, District Court, Creek County; Wade S. Stanfield, Judge. Action by A. D. Bruner against the St. Louis & San Francisco Railroad Company. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
BURFORD, C.
This is a companion case to St. Louis & S. F. R. Co. v. Bruner, 52 Okla. 349, 152 Pac. 1103, that case arising out of injuries received by a daughter, while this case arises from injuries received by the father, in the same accident. In this case, as in that one, a release in practically the same language was signed. In each case the same reply was pleaded to the answer setting up the release, to wit:
“Comes now the plaintiff, A. D. Bruner, and for reply to the answer of defendant herein denies each and every allegation of new matter therein contained. And for further…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Chicago & N. W. Ry. Co. v. WilcoxCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1902
- Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. DuranSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
- Insurance Co. v. NelsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
- St. Louis S. F. Ry. Co. v. RichardsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
- St. Louis S. F. R. Co. v. BrunerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Brownell v. MooreheadSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
- Gulf, C. & S. F. Ry. Co. v. HarpoleSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
- St. Louis & S. F. R. v. DobynsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
- Schaff v. RichardsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
- Pugh-Bishop Chevrolet Co. v. DuncanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.