Pugh-Bishop Chevrolet Co. v. Duncan

This action was commenced by the defendant in error, J. E. Duncan, as plaintiff, against Pugh-Bishop Chevrolet Company, as defendant, to recover the sum of $300 on account of the alleged conversion of an automobile. The parties will be referred to as they appeared in the lower court.

This appeal is from a verdict and judgment based on the first cause of action in ¡plaintiff’s amended petition. The plaintiff in, substance alleged that he was the owner of a 1926 Chevrolet touring car; that the defendant was a dealer in new cars; that the defendant through its officers called upon the plaintiff…