Legal Opinion

Schoen v. FREIGHTLINER LLC

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided December 24, 2008No. 040302555; A130589PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRosenblum, J.

A jury found defendant, plaintiffs employer, liable for intentional infliction of severe emotional distress. Defendant appeals, assigning error to the denial of its motion for a directed verdict. Defendant asserts that plaintiff failed to adduce sufficient evidence of outrageous conduct or of intent to inflict severe emotional distress. Defendant also argues that plaintiffs emotional distress was not a reasonable response to its conduct. We conclude that there is sufficient evidence in the record from which the jury could have found the facts necessary to establish the elements of plaintiffs…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. State v. WyattOregon Supreme Court · 2000
  2. McGanty v. StaudenrausOregon Supreme Court · 1995
  3. House v. HicksCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
  4. Mains v. II Morrow, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1994
  5. Olsen v. Deschutes CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2006

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Clemente v. StateCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2009
  2. Reeves v. Recontrust Co., N.A.District Court, D. Oregon · 2012
  3. Koller v. SchmaingCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012
  4. Anselmo v. Target Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2025
  5. Anselmo v. Target Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2025

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API