Haan, D. and P. v. Wells, J.
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION BY
WECHT, J.:
D. Scot Haan and Patrice Amity Haan (“the Haans”) appeal the trial court’s October 11, 2013 order. In that order, the trial court denied the Haans’ motion for post-trial relief and entered final judgments on the matter. We affirm.
In a memorandum opinion issued in support of the denial of the Haans’ post-trial motions, the trial court set forth the factual and procedural history of this case as follows:
[Appellants], D. [Scot] Haan and Patrice Amity Haan (“the Haans”), and [Appel-lees], John A. Wells, Jr., and his wife, Susan A. Wells (“the Wells”), are the owners of…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Commonwealth v. ClaySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
- Commonwealth v. CousarSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
- Samuel-Bassett v. Kia Motors America, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
- PETOW v. WarehimeSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
- Criswell v. KingSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by72 opinions
- Brown v. TrinidadSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
- Mader, S. v. Duquesne LightSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
- Affordable Outdoor, LLC v. Tri-Outdoor, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2019
- McFeeley, L. v. Shah, S.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2020
- C. Worley and L. Worley, h/w v. County of Delaware and M. GuraCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
67 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.