Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Clay

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided February 8, 2013PublishedCited by 717 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Justice TODD.

In this discretionary appeal by the Commonwealth, we consider whether the Superior Court applied an incorrect standard of review with respect to a claim that the verdict was against the weight of the evidence. As we find the Superior Court employed an incorrect standard of review, and erroneously substituted its own conclusions for those of the jury and the trial court, we hold the Superior Court abused its discretion. Accordingly, we reverse and remand this matter to the Superior Court for reconsideration.

The relevant background of this matter is as follows. On February…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. WidmerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  2. Commonwealth v. FarquharsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  3. Commonwealth v. BrownSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  4. Coker v. SM Flickinger Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  5. Thompson v. City of PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by717 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. AntidormiSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  2. Commonwealth v. TalbertSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
  3. Commonwealth v. Jacoby, T., Aplt.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
  4. Commonwealth v. OrieSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  5. Commonwealth v. WilliamsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2017

712 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API