Legal Opinion

Mader, S. v. Duquesne Light

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 30, 2018No. 609 WDA 2018PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY MURRAY, J.:

Duquesne Light Company (Appellant) appeals from the order granting the post-trial motion of Steven Mader (Mader) seeking a new trial as to damages. After *1261 careful consideration, we reverse in part, affirm in part, and remand to the trial court.

The trial court detailed the relevant facts and procedural history of this case as follows:

Steven Mader, a fifty-four masonry contractor, worked on a two week project involving repairs to the chimney, fireplace and front stoop of an existing home in the North Hills of Pittsburgh. On September 21, 2012, after the project had been…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Harman Ex Rel. Harman v. BorahSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  2. Kiser v. SchulteSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  3. Burrell v. Philadelphia Electric Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1970
  4. Davis v. MullenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
  5. Haan, D. and P. v. Wells, J.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Avery, A. v. Cercone, B.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2019
  2. Avery, A. v. Cercone, B.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2019
  3. Farese, L. v. Robinson, J.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2019
  4. Garman, K. v. Angino, R.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2020
  5. CHEBBANI v. SHOEMAKERDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2023

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API