Legal Opinion

Hatch v. Ward

California Supreme Court

Decided April 4, 1946No. L. A. 19600PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSchauer, J.

Petitioner, a civil service employe of the State of California, appeals from a judgment which denies her petition for writ of mandate to compel payment of her salary for a period which is the equivalent of 90 working days. During such period (from August 1,. 1943, through December 10, 1943) petitioner was necessarily absent from her regularly assigned duties in the Los Angeles office of the Industrial Accident Commission in order to care for her seriously ill mother. Prior to the occasion in question petitioner, under the provisions of rule 14a of the State Personnel Board (hereinafter quoted…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Nelson v. DeanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  2. Monahan v. Department of Water & PowerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
  3. Stohl v. HorstmannCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Nelson v. DeanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  2. Newmarker v. Regents of University of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
  3. Adams v. City of ModestoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
  4. California Teachers Assn. v. Board of TrusteesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
  5. Nadler v. California Veterans BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API