Legal Opinion
Stohl v. Horstmann
California Court of Appeal
Decided May 11, 1944No. Civ. 12580PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSpence, J.
Petitioner sought a writ of mandate to compel the respondent city auditor to draw warrants in petitioner’s favor for all salary due or to become due to petitioner under Ordinance No. 1227 C.M.S. of the City of Oakland. The trial resulted in judgment in favor of petitioner and from said judgment, respondent appeals. We will refer to the parties as petitioner and respondent throughout this discussion.
The material facts are undisputed. Petitioner has held for many years and still holds the rank of patrolman in the Oakland Police Department. In 1938 he was regularly assigned to duty in charge of…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Monahan v. Department of Water & PowerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
- State Ex Rel. Reilly v. Civil Service CommissionWashington Supreme Court · 1941
- People Ex Rel. O'Connor v. . GirvinNew York Court of Appeals · 1919
- Friedman v. KernNew York Supreme Court · 1939
- People ex rel. Stokes v. TullyNew York Supreme Court · 1905
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- People ex rel. Harris v. RizzoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
- Hatch v. WardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
- Haynie v. City of Little RockSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1967
- Madden v. City of StocktonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
- Sojka v. City of PasadenaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971