Legal Opinion
Brashar v. Mobil Oil Corp.
District Court, D. New Mexico
Decided December 19, 1984No. Civ. 83 1226BBPublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
BALDOCK, District Judge.
THIS MATTER comes on for consideration of the Motion for Partial Summary Judgment against Coleman Drilling Company submitted by defendants and third-party plaintiffs Mobil Oil Corporation and Mobil Producing Texas and New Mexico, Inc., filed May 30, 1984. The court, having considered the accompanying memoranda and the relevant law, and otherwise being advised fully in the premises, finds that the motion is well taken in part and should be granted in part.
George E. Coleman, on behalf of Coleman Drilling Company and Mobil Producing Texas and…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Guitard v. Gulf Oil Co.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1983
- Miller v. Mutual Benefit Health & Acc. Ass'n of OmahaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1966
- Alexander Film Co. v. PierceNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1942
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- State Farm Mutual Insurance v. ConyersNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1989
- Tucker v. R.A. Hanson Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1992
- Maxus Exploration Co. v. Moran Bros., Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1989
- Amoco Production Co. v. Action Well Service, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1988
- Jack Tucker v. R.A. Hanson Company, Inc., Lockheed-California Company, Division of Lockheed Corporation, and H.K. Ferguson Company, A/K/A M.K. Ferguson Company, Defendants-Third Party v. The Owl Companies, Third PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1992