Legal Opinion

State Farm Mutual Insurance v. Conyers

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided November 29, 1989No. 17600PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BACA, Justice.

Dewey and Kay Conyers appeal from a district court order granting State Farm Mutual Insurance Company (State Farm) summary judgment, holding that the substantive law of New Mexico should apply in determining the amount of policy proceeds State Farm owed the Conyers and that State Farm did not owe the Conyers any further payments under its policy. The main issue of whether the court erred in granting State Farm summary judgment can be divided into three sub-issues: (1) whether the Conyers had sufficient minimum contacts with New Mexico for the court to properly exercise…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  5. McGee v. International Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1957

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. Tercero v. ROMAN CATH. DIOCESE OF NORWICHNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Santa Fe Technologies, Inc. v. Argus Networks, Inc.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 2001
  3. Stevenson v. Louis Dreyfus Corp.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Ferrell v. Allstate InsuranceNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2008
  5. Federal Deposit Insurance v. HiattNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1994

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API