Legal Opinion
Hicks v. Astrue
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided June 16, 2010No. Civil Action 05-2093 (CKK)PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
COLLEEN KOLLAR-KOTELLY, District Judge.
Plaintiff Christine Hicks brings this action seeking review of the final administrative decision by Defendant Michael J. Astrue, in his official capacity as Commissioner of Social Security (the “Commissioner”), 1 denying Plaintiffs claim for Supplemental Security Income Benefits (“SSIB”) pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). Pending before the Court are Plaintiffs Motion for Judgment of Reversal and Defendant’s Motion for Judgment of Affirmance. After reviewing the parties’ briefs, the administrative record, and the relevant case law, the…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Deborah L. Burch v. Jo Anne B. Barnhart, Commissioner of Social SecurityCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- Jana M. Bayliss v. Jo Anne B. Barnhart, Commissioner, Social Security AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- Jackie L. HAYS, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Louis W. SULLIVAN, Secretary of Health and Human Services, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1990
- Jerome MAZIARZ, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1987
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Davis v. BerryhillDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
- (PC) Jongpil Park v. KittDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2021
- Beletzuy Monzon v. O'MalleyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2024
- Brett Lauter v. Michael RosenblattDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2020
- Brown v. KijakaziDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2022
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.