Legal Opinion

(PC) Jongpil Park v. Kitt

District Court, E.D. California

Decided March 31, 2021No. 1:19-cv-01551Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 JONGPIL PARK, Case No. 1:19-cv-01551-AWI-HBK (PC) 11 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFF’S 12 v. MOTIONS TO STRIKE DEFENDANTS’ 13 VICTOR V. KITT, ET AL., AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES 14 Defendants. (Doc. Nos. 24, 25) 15 16 17 Plaintiff Jongpil Park, a state prisoner, initiated this action by filing a pro se civil rights 18 complaint under

42 U.S.C. § 1983

on October 31, 2019. Before the Court are plaintiff’s motions 19 to strike several of defendants’ affirmative defenses. 20 I. BACKGROUND 21…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Mladen Zivkovic v. Southern California Edison CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
  2. Simmons v. Navajo County, Ariz.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
  3. Meghan Mollett v. Netflix, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
  4. Chris Kohler v. Flava EnterprisesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
  5. Norwood v. VanceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API