Legal Opinion

Brett Lauter v. Michael Rosenblatt

District Court, C.D. California

Decided June 30, 2020No. 2:15-cv-08481Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 O 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 BRETT LAUTER, ) Case No. CV 15-08481 DDP (KSx) ) 12 Plaintiff, ) ) 13 v. ) ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION ) FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT 14 MICHAEL ROSENBLATT; ECHO ) BRIDGE ENTERTAINMENT, LLC; ) 15 PLATINUM DISC. LLC; ECHO ) BRIDGE HOME ENTERTAINMENT;, ) [Dkt. 269, 275] 16 Defendants. 17 18 19 Presently before the court is pro se Plaintiff Brett Lauter’s 20 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment. Having considered the 21 submissions of the parties, the court denies the motion and adopts 22 the following Order.1 23…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Keenan v. AllanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
  5. Warren v. Fox Family Worldwide, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API