Legal Opinion

In Re Estate of Devenney

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided July 13, 1934No. 29,864PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

1 Reported in 256 N.W. 104. Appeal from a judgment of the district court dismissing an appeal taken from the probate court. The only question is whether the appellant, in attempting to perfect its appeal from the probate court to the district court, proceeded according to the statutory method for so doing and in such manner as to confer jurisdiction upon the district court.

1. At the outset we are met with a motion in this court by appellant to strike (1) a supplemental record submitted by respondents and (2) certain affidavits attached to respondents' brief and purporting to show lack of…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Knutsen v. KrookSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1910
  2. Melby v. D. M. Osborne & Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1885
  3. Hoff v. Northwestern Elevator Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1913
  4. Van Aernam v. WinslowSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1887
  5. In re the Estate of BridghamSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1924

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Nemo v. Local Joint Executive Board & Hotel & Restaurant Employees' Local No. 556Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1948
  2. Village of Aurora v. Commissioner of TaxationSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1944
  3. Nafstad v. MerchantSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
  4. Atwood v. AtwoodSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1958
  5. State v. PierceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1959

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API