Legal Opinion

In re the Estate of Bridgham

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided March 21, 1924No. 24,070PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Per curiam

The executors appealed to the district court from an order of the attorney general fixing the amount of the inheritance tax to be paid by them. The court made this order:

“The court having heretofore made and filed its findings of fact and conclusions of law herein, dated June 29, 1923: It is hereby ordered that the supplemental findings and determination of the Attorney General appealed from be corrected, amended, and modified to conform to the said findings of fact and conclusions of law, and that judgment be entered accordingly.”

The order was made, and judgment was entered pursuant thereto…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Schweigert v. AbbottSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1913
  2. Hoff v. Northwestern Elevator Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1913
  3. Van Aernam v. WinslowSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1887
  4. Koochiching Co. v. FransonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1904

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Ging v. Board of EducationSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1942
  2. In Re Trusteeship Under Last Will of RosenfeldtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1931
  3. Atwood v. AtwoodSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1958
  4. Beatty v. Winona Housing & Redevelopment AuthoritySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1967
  5. In Re Estate of NelsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1930

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API