Legal Opinion
Nafstad v. Merchant
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided April 11, 1975No. 45151PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Per curiam
Defendants appeal from an adverse judgment in the Hennepin County District Court.
The facts are as follows: On July 10, 1970, Leland J. Salisbury executed an option with defendants to buy a parcel of real estate which defendants owned. The one year option provided in pertinent part:
“Any notice demand or communication which may or shall be given or served hereunder shall be in writing and shall be deemed given and served and personally delivered, or if mailed shall be given or served the day of depositing the same in the mail, postage prepaid, certified or registered mail, and addressed as…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Nemo v. Local Joint Executive Board & Hotel & Restaurant Employees' Local No. 556Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1948
- Plath v. Minnesota Farmers' Mutual Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1877
- Vogt v. Ganlisle Holding Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1944
- In Re Estate of NelsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1930
- Kastner v. Dalton Development, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1963
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Andrews v. BlakeArizona Supreme Court · 2003
- Osprey L.L.C v. Kelly-Moore Paint Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1999
- Public Finance Co. v. Van BlaricomeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1982
- Davidson v. WyattOregon Supreme Court · 1980
- Salminen v. FranksonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.