Legal Opinion

Union Pacific Railroad v. Kinney

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided March 4, 1896No. 6335PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Error from the district court of Kimball county. Tried below before Neville, J.

1Opinion of the CourtHarrison, J.

In this action, in the district court of Kimball county, the plaintiffs (defendants in error) sought to recover of the Union Pacific Railway Company, as damages, the value of a gray stallion, alleged to have been struck and killed by a locomotive, on a portion of the company’s line of road in Kim-ball county, Nebraska, it being further alleged *394that the striking and killing of the horse were due to the negligent and careless manner in which an engine and train of cars were operated and handled by the employes of the company at the time of the occurrence. Issues were joined by the pleadings…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Moore v. WatermanNebraska Supreme Court · 1894
  2. Romberg v. FokkenNebraska Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Wax v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1894
  4. Martin v. Fillmore CountyNebraska Supreme Court · 1895
  5. C. Aultman & Co. v. PattersonNebraska Supreme Court · 1883

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Home Fire Insurance v. WeedNebraska Supreme Court · 1898
  2. Walter A. Wood Mowing & Reaping Machine Co. v. GerholdNebraska Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Nash v. CostelloNebraska Supreme Court · 1897
  4. Bailey v. EastmanNebraska Supreme Court · 1898
  5. Stanser v. CatherNebraska Supreme Court · 1908

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API