Legal Opinion

Bailey v. Eastman

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided April 8, 1898No. 8001PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Error from the district court of Dawes county. Tried below before Bartow, J.

1Opinion of the CourtHarrison, C. J.

The papers and documents herein have been filed in this court, in purposed error proceeding, in which there was sought the reversal of the judgment of the district court of Dawes county by which relators’ application for the issuance of a writ of mandamus was denied and dismissed. In what is presumably the journal entry of the *417trial and the resultant adjudication of tbe issues presented there is a statement that a motion for a new trial was filed and passed upon,- but no such pleading appears in the papers filed in this court. Furthermore — and this is of vital importance — the papers filed…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Moore v. WatermanNebraska Supreme Court · 1894
  2. Wachsmuth v. Orient InsuranceNebraska Supreme Court · 1896
  3. McDonald v. GrabowNebraska Supreme Court · 1895
  4. Union Pacific Railroad v. KinneyNebraska Supreme Court · 1896
  5. Otis v. ButtersNebraska Supreme Court · 1895

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Melcher v. HaleyNebraska Supreme Court · 1899
  2. Littell v. CrossNebraska Supreme Court · 1899

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API