Legal Opinion
Musso v. Herman (In Re Tesmetges)
United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. New York
Decided April 22, 1988No. 8-19-08023PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION
CONRAD B. DUBERSTEIN, Chief Judge.
Seven years after this adversary proceeding was commenced by the trustee to establish a fraudulent conveyance and impress an equitable lien, we finally come to the end of the long journey. As is the case where fraudulent intent requires proof of circumstantial evidence, it took the trustee that much time to try to put together the myriad tiles necessary to make up the mosaic. Equally important was the need to probe into the truthfulness of the testimony of the defendants, a factor which also contributed to the unusual length of time consumed by the…
2Cases cited43 opinions
- People v. MaliziaNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
- United States v. Tabor Court Realty Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1986
- Rubin v. Manufacturers Hanover Trust Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1981
- Marine Midland Bank v. MurkoffAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
- United States v. Gleneagles Investment Co.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1983
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Lippe v. Bairnco Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 2003
- In Re TesmetgesUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. New York · 1988
- Geltzer v. D'Antona (In Re Cassandra Group)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 2004
- Interpool Ltd. v. PattersonDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1995
- G & G Cards & Gifts, Inc. v. Berman (In Re Berman)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. New York · 1989
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.