Legal Opinion

Marine Midland Bank v. Murkoff

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 10, 1986PublishedCited by 121 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Lazer, J.

In these two appeals the appellant is a judgment creditor who succeeded in setting aside the judgment debtor’s conveyance of his interest in his jointly owned home to his wife. Dissatisfied with constructive fraud as the sole ground for the relief granted and having failed in a subsequent effort to expand the ground to include actual intent to defraud, the judgment creditor seeks the additional relief from us. It also argues that its remedies against the property and the wife of the judgment debtor should be broadened. We conclude that the plaintiff did establish…

2Cases cited57 opinions

  1. Riggs v. . PalmerNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
  2. James v. PowellNew York Court of Appeals · 1967
  3. Hiles v. . FisherNew York Court of Appeals · 1895
  4. Lowendahl v. Baltimore & Ohio RailroadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1936
  5. Lowendahl v. Baltimore & Ohio RailroadNew York Court of Appeals · 1936

52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by121 opinions

  1. Jamice Carey v. Hector Crescenzi, Armando Crescenzi and Harenzy Realty Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1991
  2. MFS/Sun Life Trust-High Yield Series v. Van Dusen Airport Services. Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1995
  3. Federal Deposit Insurance v. PorcoNew York Court of Appeals · 1990
  4. United States v. McCombsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
  5. Eberhard v. MarcuCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2008

116 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API