Legal Opinion

Von Muhlenbrock v. Billington

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided September 29, 2008No. Civil Action 05-1921 (PLF)PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

PAUL L. FRIEDMAN, District Judge.

This matter is before the Court on defendant’s motion for summary judgment. Plaintiff, Gisela von Muhlenbrock, alleges that defendant, the Librarian of Congress, retaliated against her in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e et seq., (“Title VII”). Upon consideration of the motion, plaintiffs opposition, defendant’s reply, and the entire record in this case, the Court grants defendant’s motion for summary judgment. 1

I. BACKGROUND

Plaintiff Gisela von Muhlenbrock began her employment at the Law Library of…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  5. Scott v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 2007

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Pearsall v. HolderDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2009
  2. Talavera v. ForeDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2009
  3. Lane v. VasquezDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
  4. Salar v. PruittDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
  5. Benjamin v. DuncanDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API